Pitching packs a punch to baseball bettors
Doug Upstone
Maybe it's the SportsCenter syndrome, or too many highlights on Baseball Tonight, but it sure seems like their have been more blown saves this season then in the past. Talked to a number of people, from normal every day fans to serious baseball bettors and the answer was the same, they agreed, more blown saves in 2009 then in the past. This piqued my curiosity and had to find the correct answer. As it turns out, they are up slightly, however not as much as I and others believed.
This year, save conversions are running about 65 percent, which is actually up from last season's total of 64 percent. From 2002 to 2007 the range was 66 to 68 percent. This is not earth-shattering news. Over the past seven seasons, the average number of save opportunities per team is just over 63 per year. The difference between the best and worst years is two blown saves per season, which does not automatically mean a team loses the game, as they often come back and win, like the Los Angeles Angels did Thursday afternoon in Toronto.
Where it matters to baseball bettors is the best and worst teams in the big leagues. The top five teams in saves are as follows. (Thru June 3, rounding up numbers)
1. Cincinnati - 93 percent
2. Texas – 85 percent
3. Boston – 83 percent
4. N.Y. Mets – 73 percent
5. Philadelphia – 73 percent
This group is not necessarily the best teams in baseball; nonetheless they have unique quality every one laying down money wants to see. Collectively, these teams are +29.8 units. When handicapping games, why this is important is if any of these teams have a favorable to somewhat favorable pitching matchup and they can enter the later innings with a lead, chances are they will close the deal with set-up man and closer.
Value is also to be found on the bottom end of the spectrum, playing against teams that have lamentable bullpens. In this case, if the starting pitching matchup is close to dead even and the teams are fairly equal in hitting numbers, the club with relief pitchers that struggle to hold opponents at bay, are intriguing plays. With these types of teams, a one or two run lead means it is slightly better then 50-50 they will hold the advantage and deliver a winning wager. Here is current bottom five teams in save percentage.
30) Washington - 38 percent
29) Houston – 52 percent
28) Toronto 53 percent
27) Cleveland 55 percent
26) Florida 55 percent
This grouping has lost 35.1 units in combining to blow 52 saves already this year. Though the Blue Jays are actually in the black for units won, they have given up leads, only to rebound and come back to win in last at bats.
While saving games is important, it helps to have depth and quality hurlers who have a great deal to offer. For example, the starting pitcher is cuffed around for five runs in four innings and is pulled. The particular team trails 5-1, but because of the long reliever and his cohorts shut down the opposition, sometimes they end up scoring enough runs and can sneak away with a victory, because the pen held the fort.
There are two units of measurement to identify the entire bullpen, earned run average and WHIP. (For those who forgot about how WHIP is formulated- Divide the number of hits and walks by the number of innings pitched)
The ERA is a fairly accurate method of looking at a bullpen, from a broader perspective. Generally speaking, most good teams will have lower ERA's and most bad teams will have high ERA's. Among the weakness of this statistic, it does not take into consideration the affects of ball parks (pitcher's parks vs hitter's parks). If a reliever allows the tying or winning run to score, the previous pitcher is held accountable, not the hurler that gave up the hit, which is why the stat “holds” was invented.
Here is the top and bottom teams in each league by ERA's for bullpens.
National League
1. N.Y. Mets
2. Milwaukee
3. Cincinnati
4. St. Louis
5. L.A. Dodgers
12) Houston
13) Chic. Cubs
14) Arizona
15) Colorado
16) Washington
American League
1. Boston
2. Chic. White Sox
3. Seattle
4. Tampa Bay
5. Oakland
10) Texas
11) N.Y. Yankees
12) Cleveland
13) Baltimore
14) L.A. Angels
Nearly all the National League teams are in relative harmony with the teams' records; this is not the case in the American League. Four of the top five teams in ERA bullpens in the junior circuit are average to mediocre clubs. Possibly the reasons for this is starting pitching is sordid or the offensive doesn't generate enough runs, even if the pen does its job. In the bottom assemblage is first place teams the Yankees and Rangers. Both clubs have suffered blowouts that inflated numbers and play in what is today pitcher's parks. While the jury is still out how good these bullpens will ultimately be, they have been masked in sorts by high scoring offenses.
This is where the WHIP comes into play to tie up the loose ends. The WHIP counts from first pitch by any reliever. Give up a hit or walk, it matters and here we can start to understand why certain ERA's differ from the WHIP. The Yankees WHIP is 6th in the AL, more in line with how they are playing. The White Sox, they fall to 7th when using this as measuring stick, suggesting they are not quite as effective and the offense is lagging. The most notable differential is the Mariners, who have the 3rd best ERA, yet are next to last in WHIP in the AL. This shows their pitchers create problems for themselves. For the most part the Seattle relievers have avoided major disasters; however, over the course of 162-game season, chances are this will catch up with any team.
Here is how the WHIP's shake out in each league.
National League
1. Milwaukee
2. St. Louis
3. Philadelphia
4. N.Y. Mets
5. Cincinnati
12) Chic. Cubs
13) Arizona
14) Pittsburgh
15) Colorado
16) Washington
American League
1. Toronto
2. Boston
3. Tampa Bay
4. Minnesota
5. Oakland
10) Texas
11) Baltimore
12) Kansas City
13) Seattle
14) L.A. Angels
Knowing what are the best and worst bullpens, from a complete perspective, will add real dollars to wagering account over the course of a long season.