My name is Kevin, a member of thespread.com since 2008. I live in Seattle, Washington and am a successful real estate investor, which based on the demands of my profession leaves me with a relativity fair amount of time to do with what I choose, which I choose split evenly between my family and making extra money handicapping games in MLB, professional/college football and basketball; and I do make money doing it.
Recently I came into two internet tough guys/forum clowns on thespread.com (one of the best handicapping sites around, btw) who challenged me to post my picks and results. Having done enough of that on other threads recently, I will not call them out on this one because that's not the purpose of this/these posts, though the results will ultimately be my final FUCK YOU to these jokers. To your good fortune, I will oblige because the proof is in the pudding.
The difference between me and others you might find offering their opinions these forums (these two in particular), I actually lay REAL money on the plays I'll post (willing to provide proof upon request if that really matters to you). I generally play 2-4 games per week night and 6-8 per weekend day. I wager no less than $500 and no more than $1500 per play (teasers max at $1300; parlays range between $250-$1000 - all my books max). Obviously not all my picks will win and not all my days will be profitable, however if you follow the advice over at least the next two weeks (or however long I elect do this, which will be at least two weeks in order to prove I'm not a flash in the pan) YOU WILL MAKE MONEY just as I do.
Unfortunately my schedule won't always allow, however as time does (allow), I will post the reasoning behind my plays. I will generally post my plays relatively early (PST) for those that heed my advice so that you (we) can be ahead of line movement as much as possible; before noon PST/weekdays by 9a PST weekends. I will always include a running results total for tracking sake.
Hatters will hate, and there will always be those, in particular those that brought me to doing this, therefore I WILL NOT engage in meaningless banter. While I certainly can't stop you, please don't litter in the thread with your garbage as players will be coming to this thread for useful information (and to avoid paying their books), not for your trash talk. Lets let the amount of daily increasing views and my results do the talking please. Post negative responses and you'll be proven wrong based on my results, not what I have to say in response (because there will be none).
Enjoy the profits gents.
(Effective date final week Nov/16. Posted/results documented upon request)
11/29:
WIN - (LOS ANGELES CLIPPERS vrs BROOKLYN NETS) TOTAL o215½-110 OVER 1430 / 1300
WIN - CREIGHTON -19½-110 1430 / 1300
WIN - PARLAY (2 TEAMS)
(LOS ANGELES CLIPPERS vrs BROOKLYN NETS) TOTAL o215½-110 / CREIGHTON -19½-110 500 / 1300
+$3900 (3-0)
TOTAL - 3-0 / $3900
11/30
LOSS - PARLAY (2 TEAMS)
EASTERN MICHIGAN -9-110/NORTHEASTERN -2-130 (B+1) 500 / 1178
LOSS - NORTHEASTERN -3-110 1430 / 1300 (LOSS) -1430
WIN - EASTERN MICHIGAN -9-110 1430/1300 (WIN) +1300
WIN - TEMPLE +1-110 1430/1300 (WIN)
+$670 (2-2)
TOTAL - 5-2 / $4570
12/1 - to follow
dont forget your the one who began this with an attack on timmy asking mike to ban him so im sure that your the hater haters always turn things around to there own favor and may i remind you of your high class language that you used towards a mans relatives .
Kevin are you loving our Dawgs right now 🙂
BUCKS -5.5 v NETS (opened at 4.5 and up to 6 in some places but I got 5.5)
Both teams are coming off of upset wins (Mil over Cle 118-101 and Brooklyn over LAC 127-122). Milwaukee has won two straight and three of four to get back to the .500 mark while prior to their victory over the Clips, were on an eight game slide. The Nets are just flat out bad.
The Bucks are playing solid ball and have momentum in their favor after rolling over a full strength Cavs. They simply have more weapons than the Nets despite their impressive victory over the Clips which is worth noting was a Blake Griffin-less Clips. These are two teams trending the opposite directions. Look for the Bucks improve over their first victory over the Nets earlier this year and get above .500 tonight.
BUCKS
21st in the league with 102.7 points a game
11th with 44.6 rebounds per game
2nd in assists with 24.4 per contest
11th in scoring defense as they allow 102.3 points per game
NETS
10th in the league in scoring offense with 106.2 points per game
14th in the league with 43.7 rebounds per game
22nd in the league in assists with 20.7 per game
LAST in the league in scoring defense allowing 114.5 points a game
tied for 23rd in the league by shooting 43.8 percent from the floor
4th with 11.5 three pointers per game
tied for 22nd in the league shooting 33.2 percent from long range
Bucks are 7-1 ATS in their last 8 games playing on 1 day of rest
Bucks are 4-1 ATS in their last 5 when their opponent scores 100 points or more in their previous game
Nets are 1-6-1 ATS in their last 8 games overall
Nets are 0-4 ATS in their last 4 when their opponent scores 100 points or more in their previous game
Nets are 0-4-1 ATS in their last 5 when their opponent allows 100 points or more in their previous game
KEVIN'S PLAY: BUCKS -5.5
AMNT: 1430/1300
DALLAS -3 v MINNESOTA
When I see spreads like this that don't seem to make sense because it's surprisingly low, I generally stay away. If it's too good to be true, it often is. Vegas knows what they're doing more than I do after all. However in this case I'll take the bait. Dallas is arguably one of the best (if not THE) teams in the league right now (hard to say as a Pats fan). The Vikes have been hard to beat at home (4-1) however Dallas' offense (29) has been harder to stop averaging nine more points per game than the Vikes (20). Bradford did have an efficient game last week (31-37) against a respectable Detroit defense which is allowing 22 points a contest, however that efficiency didn't translate to points on the board, which isn't a surprise given the Vikes rank dead last in the league for yards gained. Bradford will need more than 227 yards that he posted last week in order to stay competitive with the Boys tonight. While the defensive edge goes to the home team in slight, the offensive advantage is far and away for the Cowboys.
DALLAS
5-0 ATS in their last 5 road games
5-1 ATS in their last 6 vs. NFC
6-1 ATS in their last 7 games after scoring more than 30 points in their previous game
MINNESOTA
1-5 ATS in their last 6 vs. NFC
KEVIN'S PLAY: 1545/1300
-3-125 (B+½), 625/500 and 920/800 (115) - I laid 625 buying a pt on Monday when the line first moved to 3.5 thinking it would continue to go upward, not back down where it currently sits at -3 -115
All i can do is iaugh out loud, I couldn't help but show your posts, to a doctor i do work for, long time customer, and good friend for over 30 years, the clinical terms, that he spit out were to numerous to mention, in a nutshell, no pun intended, more or less he said he could retire off of you, as a single patient, must be the weather out there, alot of rain, from what i hear and i don't use bingo chips son, when i bet wow great call on the huge line move with dallas, way 2 get down early sharp shooter, your as sharp as a bowling ball boy wonder, you have issues son, seek professional help, and once again congrats on the early play on dallas, huge line move good luck sonny boy, and thanks for the info on you,
Timmy.....I look like an angel compared to this guy.
I just like to throw out some picks some hit, some don't, but I feel like I always have a good shot.
you r so right brother, so right just be humble in life, as shark said we r in this together, any knowledge from any 1 is helpfull, but the way this guy spoke, i would like to piss on his grave, and hope to god i get the chance to meet this scumbag, and the true definition, of a real estate investor, is a scumbag, who buys up properties, due to the misfortunes of others, kind of like a section 8 scumbag slum lord, I c them every day in my business, i equate them to lawyers, bullshitters, with a license to lie, scumbags, classless individuals, living a mundane existence, off the misfortunes of others
hey timmy u rember that movie 2 for the money i think was the name of it pachino an matt mcconhey in it i rembered a sceen when the guy pissed on matt mcconhey lol id pay money to see that for this fella :woohoo:
hey shark you could not have said it any better, 0 class with this dickhead, fuckin 0 class, if it wasn't my wife and kids, and my business, and if this piece of shit left his last name, i would hunt this piece of garbage down, if it wasn't for my wife and kids, this half of man has no idea what i would i do to him