Notifications
Clear all

boxer picks (mon) & (8*)>>>

5 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
459 Views
(@Guest)
Posts: 0
New Member Guest
 

WAGER [917] TEXAS RANGERS o9-5½ (8*) (C H PARK -R/J BERE -R)::-880
two OVER scoring teams with bad bullpens and weak starting pitching (Park winless away with an 8.75 ERA: Bere winless at home with a 6.72 ERA)look for a lot of runs.also all 6 of the Cubs home games at night this season have gone over the total.(27-11) on my big plays

WAGER [905] OAKLAND A'S -7½ (2*)+200
WAGER [908] MONTREAL EXPOS -9 (3*)+300
WAGER [910] FLORIDA MARLINS -6 (3*)+300
WAGER [912] NEW YORK METS -7½ (4*)-600
WAGER [913] SEATTLE MARINERS -7½ (5*)+500
WAGER [916] ATLANTA BRAVES -8½ (4*)-680
WAGER [920] STL CARDINALS -7½ (3*)+300
WAGER [921] NEW YORK YANKEES -9 (3*)+300
WAGER [927] TORONTO BLUEJAYS +6½ (3*)+390
WAGER [930] S.F. GIANTS -10 (4*)-800
WAGER [925] BOSTON RED SOX -7½ (4*)+400

many games guys but like the all a lot.good luck
we will find out tonite if continue to piss on the bookies.legend i got a lot of games i would not put a 100$ on each star.I NEVER DO.just use the 100$ as a way of calculating my wins and losses.

[ June 19, 2002, 01:26 AM: Message edited by: boxer ]

 
Posted : June 18, 2002 4:50 pm
(@legend14)
Posts: 89
Estimable Member
 

Boxer do you feel that strong with Toronto over the Dodgers,Toronto is a weak team,Mets are unpredictable,so are the Cards,and Anaheim is playing good ball right now?A's?

 
Posted : June 18, 2002 5:39 pm
(@michael-cash)
Posts: 7610
Member Moderator
 

I think that is why he rates them Legend, am I right boxer or no? My understand is that the higher the star the better he feels about the game. Let us know boxer....

MC

 
Posted : June 18, 2002 5:50 pm
(@Guest)
Posts: 0
New Member Guest
 

all the plays i put up i like.if you don't like them then just take the ones you like.don't know what else to tell you.good luck

 
Posted : June 18, 2002 5:52 pm
(@Guest)
Posts: 0
New Member Guest
 

that is correct cash.the higher the # the more i like it [Wink]

 
Posted : June 18, 2002 5:55 pm
Share: